As part of my recent conversion to using arXiv, I’ve been struck by how posting preprints arXiv synergizes incredibly well with Google Scholar. I’ve tried to make some of these points on Twitter and elsewhere, but I thought I’d try to summarize here what I see as a very powerful approach to accelerating Open Science using arXiv and several features of the Google Scholar toolkit. Part of the motivation for writing this post is that I’ve tried to make this same pitch to several of my colleagues, and was hoping to be able to point them to a coherent version of this argument, which might be of use for others as well.
A couple of preliminaries. First, the main point of this post is not about trying to convince people to post preprints to arXiv. The benefits of preprinting on arXiv are manifold (early availability of results, allowing others to build on your work sooner, prepublication feedback on your manuscript, feedback from many eyes not just 2-3 reviewers, availability of manuscript in open access format, mechanism to establish scientific priority, opportunity to publicize your work in blogs/twitter, increased duration for citations) and have been ably summarized elsewhere. This post is specifically about how one can get the most out of preprinting on arXiv by using Google Scholar tools.
Secondly, it is important to make sure people are aware of two relatively recent developments in the Google Scholar toolkit beyond the basic Google Scholar search functionality — namely, Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Updates. Google Scholar Citations allows users to build a personal profile of their publications, which draws in citation data from the Google Scholar database, allowing you to “check who is citing your publications, graph citations over time, and compute several citation metrics”, which also will “appear in Google Scholar results when people search for your name.” While Google Scholar Citations has been around for a little over a year now, I often find that many Scientists are either not aware that it exists, or have not activated their profile yet, even though it is scarily easy to set up. Another more recent feature available for those with active Google Scholar Citations profiles is called Google Scholar Updates, a tool that can analyze “your articles (as identified in your Scholar profile), scan the entire web looking for new articles relevant to your research, and then show you the most relevant articles when you visit Scholar”. As others have commented, Google Scholar Updates provides a big step forward in sifting through the scientific literature, since it provides a tailored set of articles delivered to your browser based on your previous publication record.
With these preliminaries in mind, what I want to discuss now is how a Google Scholar plays so well with preprints on arXiv to accelerate science when done in the Open. By posting preprint to arXiv and activating your Google Scholar Citation profile, you immediately gain several advantages, including the following:
- arXiv preprints are rapidly indexed by Google Scholar (with 1-2 days in my experience) and thus can be discovered easily by others using a standard Google Scholar search.
- arXiv preprints are listed in your Google Scholar profile, so when people browse your profile for your most recent papers they will find arXiv preprints at the top of the list (e.g. see Graham Coop’s Google Scholar profile here).
- Citations to your arXiv preprints are automatically updated in your Google Scholar profile, allowing you to see who is citing your most recent work.
- References included in your arXiv preprints will be indexed by Google Scholar and linked to citations in other people’s Google Scholar profiles, allowing them to find your arXiv preprint via citations to their work.
- Inclusion of an arXiv preprint in your Google Scholar profile allows Google Scholar Updates to provide better recommendations for what you should read, which is particularly important when you are moving into a new area of research that you have not previously published on.
- [Update June 14, 2013] Once Google Scholar has indexed your preprint on arXiv it will automatically generate a set of Related Articles, which you can browse to identify previously published work related to your manuscript. This is especially useful at the preprint stage, since you can incorporate related articles you may have missed before submission or during revision.
I probably have overlooked other possible benefits of the synergy between these two technologies, since they are only dawning on me as I become more familiar with these symbiotic scholarly tools myself. What’s abundantly clear to me at this stage though is that by embracing Open Science and using arXiv together with Google Scholar puts you at a fairly substantial competitive advantage in terms of your scholarship, in ways that are simply not possible using the classical approach to publishing in biology.
One question: what’s the status of the Google Scholar API?
there is no API, only screen scrappers, and it seems that Google Scholar changes their pages just to break scrappers code.
I’m pretty sure that Google will never release an API for Scholar, since their spidering almost surely violates the terms and conditions of most publishers (even if they have purchased site licenses). I’d imagine there is an uneasy truce between publishers and Google, where if Google doesn’t go too far (eg. no API, and downplaying the existence of scholar by droping its menu presence), publishers will allow Google to do things that any other individual/group would get blocked for, since Google has the power to drive massive traffic to publisher sites.
Graham Coop notes that it is easy to use GS’s merge records features to resolve preprints with final published versions:
Africa Gomez notes that it is really easy to invite other people to sign up for GS Citations:
Accelerating Your Science with arXiv and Google Scholar | Science ouverte | Scoop.it
Thanks for the pointers. I just set up my profile. Scholar Update doesn’t seem to have kicked in yet, I guess it must take some time for them to compute the recommendations. They should just show up on the frontpage of scholar.google.com, right?
Great to hear this post is getting more people on board to use these tools!
I can’t say how long Updates takes to kick in after you set up your Citations profile, since mine was set up prior to Updates being launched. It would be great if you could report back here on how long it takes for yours to appear.
Updates show up in two places, right under the GS search box on the GS main page when you have not seen them yet. After this you can see them by clicking the “My Updates” button (with a bell icon) in the upper right hand corner (in between “My Citations” and “Metrics”)
Weird, I do not have those links. Nothing between “My Citations” and “Metrics”.
Can you paste the actual URL that your “My Updates” points to? For example, my “Metrics” link points to: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en
Maybe if I can reverse-engineer the URL, I can figure out why I don’t have the link.
I suspect this link will appear when your GS Updates gets activated. The URL on my SGS page points to: http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?sciupd=1&oi=tb&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
Woo-hoo, this is what it’s all about:
Yes, google scholar finds arxiv pre-prints pretty fast. However it looks like there are some issues with identifying links. Specifically, one of my arxiv pre-prints (call it A) has a reference to another one (call it B) and although both – A and B – are detected by google scholar this reference is not counted by the system towards citations of B … By any chance, does anyone know the reason for that? Or does it just take time for the system to update citations?
Taming the Information Overflow – Part 2 | Jakob Rosenkrantz de Lasson
The DarXer Side of publishing on the arXiv – Enseqlopedia
Crosspost: Using Google Scholar in Scholarly Workflows – microBEnet: the microbiology of the Built Environment network.
Using Google Scholar in Scholarly Workflows – Amazing Tech
Using Google Scholar in Scholarly Workflows – dfuture.bmj.com alpha site
Crosspost: Using Google Scholar in Scholarly Workflows – UC Davis Library